info@symbiosisip.co.uk

A return to traditional threshold of Sufficiency in UK Patent Law following Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc vs Kymab Ltd?

Author: Lee Samuel | lee@symbiosisip.co.uk

2 Jul 2020

#

In the decision [2020] UKSC 27, dated 24 June 2020, the UKSC decided upon a longstanding dispute between Regeneron and Kymab.  The case concerned two Regeneron patents for the production of human antibodies using transgenic mice. Typically, human antibodies made by transgenic mice induce immunological sickness. However, this can be prevented by replacing part of the mouse antibody variable regions with human antibody variable regions thus producing hybrid antibodies containing mouse and human variable regions.

Kymab’s case focused on the concept of sufficiency in UK patent law, specifically in relation to product claims that cover a range of embodiments when the patent only contains data exemplifying a few. In short, how much supporting data is needed to uphold a broad claim. Kymab alleged the filed application, whilst disclosing antibody production when replacing several variable regions, did not disclose data showing that when replacing a large number/all of mouse antibody variable regions with human variable regions, in a single mouse, would lead to antibody production. Rather, Kymab alleged the filed application only disclosed success for a smaller range or subset. Regeneron countered it had met its disclosure obligations even though it had not specified precisely how all the claimed products may be made.

The UKSC decided in Kymab’s favour, and invalidated both of the EP(UK) patents for insufficient disclosure stating that the two patents only enabled the skilled person to make products across what it assessed to be part of the claims.

Summary

UK and EP law consistently state that a set of claims to a single product or a range of products has to be “sufficiently disclosed”, which means that the skilled person must be able to put the invention into effect across the entire scope of the claims, on reading the filed application using no more than common general knowledge and without “undue experimental burden”.  This ensures the extent of the granted patent monopoly corresponds with the extent of the contribution the patent disclosure makes to the art

The present decision reminds us that a patent claim to a product lacks sufficient disclosure if it is not possible on reading the first filing to make substantially all the products that fall within its scope.  Judging the amount of data to put in a patent application, having regard to the amount of protection required, is a skill underpinned by a vast knowledge of case law, so consult with your patent attorney before filing. Moreover, consider carefully when to file; filing too early and with insufficient data may curtail protection or even make the patent vulnerable to revocation for lack of sufficiency.

If you have any queries please get in touch

"Result oriented, very responsive, a value creator and a person with a clear vision and strategy"

Senior Corporate Counsel

"Lee Samuel readily understands technology and consistently demonstrates thorough knowledge of patent law, great attention to detail and efficient organisational skills, leading to successful grants."

IAM Patent 2022 Client Interview

"Driven, dedicated and knowledgeable in the whole spectrum of work covering commercialisation of technology"

UK University Senior Tech Transfer

"Our two companies collaborate very well together to optimise the commercial benefits of the Glycologic Limited portfolio of activities."

Richard Tester
Managing Director, Glycologic Limited

"Vast experience in commercialising science and technology"

Senior UK Patent Attorney

"The service provided by Symbiosis is personal, efficient and highly professional."

IAM Patent 2022 Client Interview

"Mark Hoggins consistently delivers excellent service and detailed and informed responses to examiners, and helps clients understand each step and grow in their understanding of the IP protection process."

IAM Patent 2022 Client Interview

"Julie always asks the right questions and grasps the heart of the invention easily. Julie expresses herself very clearly and it is straightforward to communicate with her, in both written and oral form. She presents commercial strategies, thanks to her long experience in the field and concrete exposure to challenges that she has been able to overcome."

IAM Patent 2022 Client Interview

"Their communications are clear and always in good time for action to be taken. They have established a good network of foreign associates and we have recently had successful filings in the USA, Japan and China without a need for extensive office action and its associated costs."

IAM Patent 2022 Client Interview

"Andrew lived up to our expectations, helping us take a very hard negotiation over the line. We enjoyed working with him and would do so again. I would definitely recommend him to organisations trying to navigate IP licensing negotiations"

UK CEO

"Excellent technical licensing and deal-making skills, [a] can-do attitude and an inherent sense of value to each assignment"

Senior Leader, Corporate

"It is not an exaggeration to state that our confidence in Rob and Symbiosis is such that the strategic direction of our company has been IP-led at all times."

IAM Patent 2022 Client Interview

"One of those rare breeds who manage to combine considerable technical expertise with a keen business sense"

Senior Leader, Corporate

"Symbiosis maximises the value of IP generated by our inventors in a cost effective and efficient manner that meets our commercial objectives."

Martin Whitaker
CEO, Diurnal

"Symbiosis dives deep into the science and data and then gives an excellent assessment of the potential for the patent to be granted and the value of said patent."

IAM Patent 2022 Client Interview

"It is a privilege to work with Symbiosis."

Prof. Richard Ross, CSO
Asterion Limited

"Andrew gave us the confidence that the final terms agreed were fair and in line with the current best practice"

UK University Head of Tech Transfer

"Cardiff University has a longstanding relationship with Symbiosis IP and we have always experienced a consistently high quality range of IP services. We particularly appreciate the ability to provide bespoke advice for academic, TTO or industry audiences as appropriate and this has contributed significantly to our translational successes across the life sciences portfolio."

Rhodri Turner
Senior Technology Transfer Officer, Cardiff University

"The work carried out by Symbiosis has always been of high quality. The team have a wealth of experience and understanding in life sciences, which means they are able to provide advice on patent filing from the earliest stage right through prosecution."

IAM Patent 2022 Client Interview

Our use of cookies

We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. These will be set only if you accept.

For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page. Cookie Control Link Icon


Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.